Hi there ! I post earlier than usual this week because I may be lacking time during next days. First, I tried again to record the Waltz Op.70 No.1 from Chopin : I'm quite pleased with the result though I know there is still place for improvement. I've also tried to perform one impromptu from Schubert, This impromptu seems to be well-known here, which quite astonished me since it is not very famous otherwise. Along with this I post a few variations from Kabalevski and a humoresque from Dvorak. I reckon that the Kabalevski may not be eligible for upload because he died in 1987 (therefore its music is not yet in public domain). However I feel that I can post it here anyway so you can listen to it and maybe appreciate it. (though, if this is a problem, please tell me and I'll remove it !). Please give me feedback and enjoy ! Henri Chopin - Waltz In G Flat Major, Op. 70, No. 1 Kabalevsky - Six Variations On A Ukrainian Folk Song, Op. 51, No. 5 Schubert - Impromptu in A-flat major, Op. 142, no. 2 Dvorak - Humoresque No.7 in G flat major
Hi Henri, I think your Chopin is better now too. And I liked the nice, snappy way you played the Dvorak. Good job on that one. The Kabalevsky is fine too. I have never heard it before. And don't worry about it being on the site; we have some Kabalevsky already. :wink: I don't have time to listen to the Schumann right now - but I'll take care of all of this tomorrow. In the meantime I want to tell you something: When you submit recordings, please supply the whole title like the opus numbers, name of movement, etc. It saves me so much time from having to look everything up myself. Look on our main site if you are not sure how to name something. Even right now, I need more information on the Kabalevsky piece here. What is the opus number?
Ok, I looked up the Kabalevsky and have what I need now. At least I think so. Last night when I was looking, I got a different variations and got confused - so you should check this. I see you did supply most of the information on the other files - just also please remember to give me opus numbers too. These are all up except for the Dvorak. I'm having a problem with the link - can't get it to stick - have no idea why. I'll try again after breakfast - maybe that's the problem... :lol:
Henri, I'm still having a problem with the Dvorak. I have uploaded it three times with no success. Can you please re-attach it? Maybe there's something wrong with the first attachment - can't think of any reason though - I dunno...let's just try it again please.
Hi Monica, and thank you for your feedback and for uploading. Sorry for not giving you the details for the Kabalevski. I've checked it and it's ok. I'll do better next time I don't understand why you experienced problems with the Dvorak since it seemed to work perfectly on upload. However I'll try to upload it again.
I can't explain it, but that second attachment worked. You're all set now. Also, please don't feel like you have to submit multiple recordings all the time. One or two at a time is better (for me :wink: ).
Well done ! I enjoyed the Kabalevsky most, probably because it was new to me. Your triplets in the Chopin are better but still don't quite sound like triplets. The Schubert is a hard piece to bring off without the listener getting bored. I'm not sure you succeed. Good playing anyway.
May depend on the listener... :wink: It's not my preferred impromptu but I could listen to it up to the end without getting bored. I think that it is a good performance, which may be missing something that I can't identify: contrast, engagement, feeling... I like the sound. I think that recording in mono is a good way for making the digital sound more acoustic. I much prefer this sound to an X-wide stereo.
I'm sorry Alfonso, I should have written more precisely: I think that recording in mono is a good way for making a digital piano sounding more like an acoustic one. I much prefer this sound to an X-wide stereo. I would not have read that Henri was playing a digital piano, I may have believed it was a very good acoustic one. But a digital piano in stereo is most often awful to my ears.
Oh, your statement was clear in the first place! Perhaps it was my question that wasn't. Since the digital piano sound is awful to my ears too, I am curious about the fact that a mono recording can (at least partially) disguise it and given you're clearly an audio pundit I ask you if there is some technical explanation for it. Maybe because part of the digitalness of the sound we perceive in the end comes from a further internal process of creating the final stereo image after the raw piano samples are played?
It's just my feeling about this sound. I think that mono makes sound the piano further, which is good to me because I don't like to have my ears on the hammers, hearing the lows at far left and the highs at far right as often with digital piano. Some distance to the piano is required for me forgetting the sound and listening to the music. That's a pity that the lows sound rather boomy here. Once they are tamed a bit, it's really a nice sound to me. Then adding some hiss would give something reminiscent of the late 50s. :wink: