DONATION STATUS
Needed before 2016-12-31
$ 2,500
So far donated
$ 860

Chopin - Nocturne op.48 no.2

Discussion in 'Submission Room' started by Chaotica, Apr 16, 2007.

  1. Chaotica

    Chaotica New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Last Name:
    Lebenstedt
    First Name:
    Jan-Felix
    Wow. This gives the word "finally" a new meaning. I've never been sweating so much on a day in April. Nearly 30°C here and endless attempting to record this - don't know how to call this beauty which turned out to be a beast for me. It always felt like three times longer than the Op. 62 nocturne with its page-long phrases and the very slow middle section.

    OK, time to go to bed now...

    Yeah! 8)

    Chopin - Op.48 no.2, Nocturne in F-sharp minor
     
  2. pianolady

    pianolady Monica Hart, Administrator Staff Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,716
    Likes Received:
    1
    Last Name:
    Hart
    First Name:
    Monica
    Wow, that was really great. The only teeny, tiny, thing is that you play it a little on the fast side, with maybe not enough rubato. Don't yell at me, I think you played this well, better than I ever could. If you could play with a bit more tenderness it will help. Oh, and I think there's a wrong note in measure 38 of the Molto pui lento section.
     
  3. juufa72

    juufa72 New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,388
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Obamanation, unfortunately...
    Last Name:
    Grocholski
    First Name:
    Julius
    I agree, you play a little fast. (But it's not a slaughter like Cziffra and his interpretations of Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsodies :lol: :wink: )

    But other than that, it is well done.

    It is interesting to hear the sound of your piano because it sounds a lot like Mr. Robert's piano.
     
  4. Chaotica

    Chaotica New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Last Name:
    Lebenstedt
    First Name:
    Jan-Felix
    Thank you two. :)

    Which part do you find too fast? The A part, the B part or the recapitulation (if you can call the last part this way)? Or two or three of them?

    OK, I'm not the only who thinks this F minor chord sounds wrong. But it is both in the online edition and in my Peters one.

    But there are real mistakes in bar 46 and especially in bar 51.
     
  5. pianolady

    pianolady Monica Hart, Administrator Staff Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    8,716
    Likes Received:
    1
    Last Name:
    Hart
    First Name:
    Monica
    The A part and recap. can be a bit slower - or just more laid-back.
    I see what you mean about that chord - In my Schirmer edition (which I know isn't always reliable) it has a D-flat on the bottom of the RH which sounds a lot better than a C, which does sound weird.
     
  6. robert

    robert New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Stahlbrand
    First Name:
    Robert
    Not the favourite Nocturne of mine but I think it is really well played and is IMO not played too fast. I think I heard a wrong note here and there but only very minor errors.

    It is up on the site.
     
  7. MindenBlues

    MindenBlues New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Schmidt
    First Name:
    Olaf
    Sounds very well to me. Don't think it's too fast, although Nocturnes should all sound more or less calm from the character (there are parts were it can explode of course), maybe you could sound slightly calmer in the A-part.

    Nevertheless, I like your playing much - thank you for posting!
     

Share This Page