DONATION STATUS
Needed before 2016-12-31
$ 2,500
So far donated
$ 825

Bach - BWV 782, 2-part Invention in G minor

Discussion in 'Submission Room' started by robert, Apr 16, 2007.

  1. robert

    robert New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Stahlbrand
    First Name:
    Robert
    WEBSITE:
    http://pianosociety.com
    WLM:
    robertstahlbrand@hotmail.com
    LOCATION:
    Sweden
    Another little submission in my plan to complete the 2-part inventions. The pretty unusual G minor which has certain passages where I feel one can draw parallels to early Schoenberg.

    Bach BWV 782 - 2-part invention in G minor
     
  2. techneut

    techneut Active Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Last Name:
    Breemer
    First Name:
    Chris
    LOCATION:
    Netherlands
    BIt on the slow side, but conscientiously played as always. Did you leave out the first LH G in bar 3 ?
    Apart from that, nothing to niggle about except your inconsistent ornaments. The trillo uses the upper note, the mordant the lower note. Not that it matters so much, but it's something to pick on :lol: This recording allowed me to correct some reading mistakes I have always made. :D
     
  3. John Robson

    John Robson New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Miami, Florida, USA
    Last Name:
    Robson
    First Name:
    John
    LOCATION:
    Miami, Florida, USA
    Bach

    Very well played, Robert. I have an edition edited by Busoni in which all of the ornamental figures are written out. Perhaps you also have the Busoni edited version for your ornaments are executed exactly as they are written in my edition. My edition also suggest that it be played "Quietly and expressive" which I think you also did. I enjoyed it.
     
  4. robert

    robert New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Stahlbrand
    First Name:
    Robert
    WEBSITE:
    http://pianosociety.com
    WLM:
    robertstahlbrand@hotmail.com
    LOCATION:
    Sweden
    Thanks for listening.

    I also use a version with all ornaments written out as in the attached sheet and play them as in this score. The missing G in bar 3 is tied there so that is why I left it out but I am not sure if that is right really.

    Happy to track a couple of misreadings there Chris :D.

    What bothers me most when I listen back to it is the inconsistency in tempo. I start out too slow and catch up a bit later which is not good. I underestimated this invention in difficulty...I always do :?.
     
  5. techneut

    techneut Active Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Last Name:
    Breemer
    First Name:
    Chris
    LOCATION:
    Netherlands
    Ah, that explains everything I heard. Except the slow tempo :)
    This looks rather different from the Urtext. A Czerny edition ?

    Yes I thought it was not quite consistent, but was not sure so dod not comment on it (floows that is is probably not too bad :) You'd have less of this problem at a somewhat more lively tempo.
     
  6. robert

    robert New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Stahlbrand
    First Name:
    Robert
    WEBSITE:
    http://pianosociety.com
    WLM:
    robertstahlbrand@hotmail.com
    LOCATION:
    Sweden
    Really hated the first recording I made so I spent 4 hours today making a new (I should stop make recordings late at nights and then just put them up without really thinking...) which is significantly different. Hope you like this one.
     
  7. MindenBlues

    MindenBlues New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Germany
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Schmidt
    First Name:
    Olaf
    WEBSITE:
    http://www.family-schmidt-minden.de
    LOCATION:
    Germany
    I did NOT hate your first recording, but I like your second one even more. Reason foremost, because it sounds more lyrical, also more fluid and evenly.

    Maybe a little suggestion for spots with trills - the trills stand out a bit dynamically wise in your case. It sounds more casual if the ornaments are less weighted compared to the context as the other way round. It's difficultier but worth the effort (but also only subjective opinion).

    Good job!!!
     
  8. robert

    robert New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Stahlbrand
    First Name:
    Robert
    WEBSITE:
    http://pianosociety.com
    WLM:
    robertstahlbrand@hotmail.com
    LOCATION:
    Sweden
    Thanks and you are right about the trills. They shine right through and I know I do not like that with other pianists as a complete CD can be really tiresome with for example Angela Hewitt who continuously play them with too much power and focus. The casual approach is a lot better and I will try to keep that in mind and implement it further on.
     
  9. techneut

    techneut Active Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Last Name:
    Breemer
    First Name:
    Chris
    LOCATION:
    Netherlands
    The first version was not to be hated, but this is way better. Much more relaxed and fluent, in steady tempo and with nice dynamics. Indeed the trills sound a bit too prominent, as if they don't come quite naturally yet and you're straining to do them right. I expect this to get better as you progress in the cycle.
    One thing that perked my ear is that in bar 18 you play an F natural instead of an F sharp. Apart from that, I think it's note perfect, and IMO the best Bach recording you made so far.
     
  10. robert

    robert New Member Piano Society Artist

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sweden
    Home Page:
    Last Name:
    Stahlbrand
    First Name:
    Robert
    WEBSITE:
    http://pianosociety.com
    WLM:
    robertstahlbrand@hotmail.com
    LOCATION:
    Sweden
    Ah, yes missed that F-sharp there...always something isn't?

    Thanks for the compliment and I do find Bach difficult to play. Much more difficult than many other various composers. The reason is the contrapunct which I find very hard to memorize and I rely a lot on memory. Not sure what plan I have for the cycle once it is complete. I will re-record a lot of them as time goes by I think.
     

Share This Page