hi Folks

Hopefully this is a suitable place to instroduce myself - Im Rich, 41 from Birmingham, England.

Im a little nervous as Im not sure whether you will feel that my music falls under the classical banner. Im much influenced by my favourite classical composers - particularly the Romantic and Impressionist eras, but also by the minimalists and contemporary music such as electronica and post-rock.

Anyway, I hope some of you will enjoy my music and Id welcome any feedback or comments. Please visit http://www.richbatsford.com/music to listen.

many thanks

Rich

Hello Rich,
For me your music is very beautiful for "ambience" music with dinner and polite conversation, etc. From a standpoint of it falling under "the classical banner" there's no chance of it. It is too static and repetitive (which is great for calming nevers and soothing oneself) and has no memorable melodies or tonal journey, and therefore is not suitable for significant story-telling. I found no influneces of "Romantic" or "Impressionist" composers, far less any minimalism, contemporary techniques or devices, electronica or post-rock for that matter, but did hear some jazz idiom in Completion. In summary, you write beautiful music for a certain purpose, but it isn't the kind that any pianists will want to buy the score of to perform for others in a program. They will, however, likely want to buy your CD(s) and play them during romantic dinners or at the end of a difficult day at work. Just my 2 cents. BTW, one litmus test of piano "art" music is whether you're intending to sell scores. If you are only intending to sell CDs, then I venture to say that it isn't "classical" (meaning "art" music). I by no means mean to denigrate here, I'm only identifying style by intent.

Good luck.

Hi Eddy

thanks for your message. Its always interesting to consider one's motives and purpose - for me, creating beautiful music that has an engaging and emotional effect on the listener would probably sum it up pretty well. From what you say, it sounds like you may think Im succeeding.

As for my influences - they are all there in my "musical character" and have all affected the way I think about musical shape, tonality, phrasing and structure although Im certainly not looking to recreate or evoke any particular style. More to absorb the many different musical styles that have had an effect on me and from that melting pot to write music that is original and which, as a starting point, has an effect on me (if I know a new composition has a strong effect on me when I play it, theres got to be a reasonable chance it will have an effect on others as well).

Youre right that I aim more for people to listen to my music (either live or in person) than to play it themselves and thats an interesting slant on the nature of composition. I do write from the "fingers and the heart" more than from "pencil and the mind" (to coin a couple of awkward phrases!). That said, in the limited exposure my music has had so far, Ive had a few enquiries after sheet music, so there is an interest there.

Anyway, whilst I would overall agree that my music is unlikely to be thought of as falling officially within the classical tradition (I hope its ok for me to pop on here now and again to share and discuss my music. Im also looking at expanding on the teaching side of things as well in the future (I have a handful of private pupils) and if Im going to progress this further, I may be looking for some advice and conversation on traditional repertoire.

best wishes

Rich

I listened to the pieces on your site. Beautiful harmonies, gorgeous sound, well recorded and performed. However as a classical listener I got bored with all the pieces within the minute... You just can't milk the same rudimentary tune for 6 minutes and still hold a listener's interest. Strangely, I can appreciate quite some minimal music, but that's probably because it usually offers repetition with subtle variations in rhythm, pitch, tonality, dynamics etc... This is all just too repetitive, sorry. Not really our cup of tea here I'm afraid. As background/ambient music this is probably very good.

Of course you're very welcome here to participate and discuss traditional classical music.
BTW Is this an acoustic studio recording ? What piano ? The sound is most impressive.

Hi Chris

glad you found something to enjoy in my music. I know my stuff is more repetitive that most in (classical) history, but perhaps not so much from a contemporary perspective. I rather like the music of Steve Reich and Phil Glass and the genres of krautrock, breakbeat and downtempo electronica - all of which use a great deal more repetition than I. My aim in using repetition is to build a mood and create tension and purpose - quite often when I will repeat a section, the second time I extend and develop it into new territory, creaing a wave like effect that builds to a cliamax, before, typically, some restatement and a suitable close.

The recording was made using a Roland FP4 digital piano plugged directly into a music studio.

cheers

Rich

Rich,
I would love to discuss this with you anytime, when the time is right for you, either on this Composing Forum or even in Private Message (PM) if you prefer.

Also, the "static" devices in western music entered by means of the influx of eastern philosophical/religious infuences as well as some monism. I'm curious if you have had any such influence, either removed through Reich, Glass and others or directly in a personal investigation of same?

Eddy

Whoa. I must say it sounds mighty good. Does that 'music studio' use sampled piano sound, like PianoTeq ?

thanks Eddy, I'll look forward to that.



Ive been practicing and studying Buddhism for four years or so, but I dont think that has had a direct effect on my music except that I generally now have a much calmer and clearer mind state than I used to. I first started composing in those few rare moments of mental quietude that I would get, often after a busy week at work, then some pretty heavy duty partying on a saturday night/sunday morning and then finding a quiet moment on a sunday where my mind was calm enough to just sit at the piano and play. Now, altho I still have busy days when its non stop - most days I find I have at least enough mental space to play and often to toy with an idea or two, or even develop an idea into a piece.

Im not sure if that really was what you were asking about, but that is probably the chief way Eastern influence has affected my music.

How about you, have you been influenced by Eastern music? Sounds interesting.

Re Reich and Glass - I only started listening to Glass fairly recently, when people started mentioning his work a lot after having heard mine. But when I was 18 or so, a friend gave me a CD of Steve Reich's - Different Trains, and that had a piece on it called Electric Counterpoint which I really loved. I think it was listening to that and later on to other pieces and to electronica and post-rock that set me on the trail of more repetitive and minimalist structures.

cheers

Rich

No, the sound was the Roland's own sample set.

What I did was record in the first instance into the memory of the Roland (nice and easy one touch stuff). Then took the instrument to my friends music studio (Bartrum of [url]Feathered Fish[/url] studios) where we took a midi line out and into Logic on a mac. There we fixed a couple of wrong notes using a terrific visual interface (I loved the geometric coloured patterns the music takes on in this form) and then played the new midi signal back through the keyboard, taking an audio line directly out and back into Logic.

A little bit of audio tinkering from Bartrum and then sent to another engineer to be mastered and what you hear is the result. Im glad you like it, Ive been very happy with it too.

cheers

Rich

Interesting. Rather contrived all the same, as compared to playing on a real instrument and recording it acoustically warts and all.
I suppose it is the end that justifies the means... But let's not rake up that discussion here again.

Well, one has to work within ones resources - I dont have regular access to a grand piano. Besides, the digital is very versatile - I can easily take it to gigs and perform anywhere and its easy to record (and never goes out of tune).

Rich

Only by pentatonic scales (but via western music).

Sometimes I feel the same way about certain Schubert pieces!

Certainly I'm hearing a lot more minimalism in this music than romantic/impressionist influences. It's enjoyable to listen to, but as a pianist I don't have the urge to ask for the sheet music and try playing it myself--because it doesn't use much of the resources of the instrument. That's where I think Philip Glass shows his classical background--in amongst all that repetition, you'll hear a huge variety of tone colours and textures; he uses the full resources at his disposal.

Re the digital recording technique:

Purely acoustic recordings can get pretty contrived too, when you start playing around with microphone placement, using more than one pair of mics, editing and so on.

Anyway, thanks Rich for sharing this music with us, and I look forward to some interesting discussions in the future.

Mhh yes, I do get impatient with some Schubert pieces too. Can't precisely say which, but he does go on a bit sometimes.

hi Alexander

could you expand more on what you were saying here about tone, colours and textures, sounds interesting and a good opportunity for learning for me if you wouldnt mind. If you can point to any particular examples in Glass' piano work, even better, as Im starting to get to know it a little.

by the way, I see youre in Adelaide, theres a significant chance I might be moving there in a few months, so maybe we may yet have the opportunity to chat about this over a long black.

best wishes

Rich