chopins rain drop prelude

Upload new recordings for evaluation and discussions. Acoustic instruments preferred, although digital is allowed. MIDI or other digitally rendered/manipulated recordings will not be admitted.

Moderators: pianolady, techneut, robert

Posts: 647
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:38 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

chopins rain drop prelude

Postby johnmar78 » Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:30 pm

Here is my latest recoding..I am old and no power.

Admin edit: replaced attacgment by live link : Chopin Prelude Op.28 No.15 (Raindrop)

Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:34 pm

Postby PJF » Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:45 pm

I can see you evolving in your work John. Every time I hear you, it's a bit better than the last. Keep it up, pal. This is the best I've ever heard you play, artistically speaking. IMO, the recording is worthy of being put up on the site. Good show!

One little bit to bother: In the B section, the G# ostinato should be perfectly even 16th notes; you played it as though it was a triplet, with the first two beats of each triplet being tied. It should go in quadruplets, Pum-pum-pum-pum, pum-pum-pum-pum. You played triplets, Pumm-pa-Pumm-pa-Pumm-pa-Pumm-pa. This minor fluke doesn't affect the piece much, the way you played it (albeit wrong) actually fits the sinister mood of that section. The ornaments could have been better articulated, but blah blah blah....that's minor.


Posts: 692
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 5:29 am
Location: Germany

Postby MindenBlues » Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:14 am

I agree with Pete's opinion. Especially I like your tone in general and the dynamics in the middle part!

The only minor things I have to niggle are, that there are some "raindrops" missed in some bars. You let the right hand melody shine, but especially in the beginning a bit static (instead melody bows), maybe a bit hasty too.

Beside those minor things, a really good recording! Carry on!

Site Admin
Posts: 8676
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:38 pm

Postby pianolady » Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:23 pm

I think overall your tone is nice, (good dynamics, accents). One thing I noticed about the counting - 1. Too many eighth notes (raindrops) in measure 47 (or measure 48 - which is not a big deal.
2. But I heard not enough beats in measures 61 and the same thing in measure 69. Those two measures are the same. I'm not sure if this is an error in your score, or if I'm counting it wrong. Other than that, good job.

Site Admin
Posts: 9925
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:45 am
Location: Netherlands

Postby techneut » Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:24 pm

I mostly agree with previous posters. Mood, conception, tone, dynamics, are all good.
Now what you need to do is :

1) Maintain a more steady pulse (i.e. not rush ahead within the bar)
2) Be a bit more careful in observing all the (right) notes

to make it still better. Indeed, it sounds a bit breathless in the
beginning. Easy does it !
Nothing is always absolutely so -- Sturgeon's law
Chris Breemer

Posts: 647
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:38 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby johnmar78 » Wed Nov 29, 2006 12:31 am

thanks for the reply everyone.

Yes, I noticed that I had TWO extra rain was caused after a big storm in my house and a leaking roof, as a result of droppings in my recording.... :lol: :lol:

Never mind. I am happy at least.

Return to “Audition Room”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests