Sandro Bisotti wrote:
Only I find curious that , in the first 4-5 positions of the list, the only who diminuish the daily average download is myself. In other words, about half of the downloads of my recordings ( as listed one week ago) were done by "auto-downloaders and other suspicious clients" , and Breemer,
Alianello and other ones in the first positions were regular and continue about at the same download rythm.
Could well be. Certain recordings are especialy popular and get downloaded massively, mostly by the same few clients (we suspect they have it looped in some web media player).
Sandro Bisotti wrote:
In the last 4-5 months (and also in janury data as read from me one week ago) the average downloads of "my" files was about 1000 a day.
No one of my files had that high number of monthly downloads (6,7K or more) that cause the suspect of "auto-downloaders and other suspicious clients". Now, with the values that I read today, the daily average download of my files become about 500 a day. I find this strange (considering, I repeat, the fact that others in high list position preserve their daily average download as in old values ), and the question was if I have to consider correct this values or the "old" ones.
Yes, I see your point. Haven't looked at the stats recently, but I am not sure this can be explained in any way. Maybe things will stabilize now that the filtering is in place.
Sandro Bisotti wrote:
This is only a demontration of good taste. But remain that about 200-250 downloads of this
file (in my version) in the ststistics of 6 days ago and the actual value of 58 make me curious.
Hehehe, i was only joking. I'll have a look. Not sure I can explain it though.